The European Commission’s Harrie Temmink, whom told ICE the other day that EU-wide online gambling legislation would maybe not occur in his lifetime ‘or the next.’
The European Commission (EC) has abandoned the thought of a pan-European regulatory framework for online gambling, accepting that each member states mostly oppose synchronizing their Internet gaming regulations. The move interestingly mirrors similar dilemmas in the US, where states’ rights vs. federal dictates have grown to be a battle that is ongoing the iGaming wars.
Speaking at last week’s International Casino Exhibition in London (ICE), Harrie Temmink told the industry emphatically that the EC was not focusing on sector-specific legislation in gambling.
‘The Commission is not proposing it and will not https://casinopokies777.com/casino-888/ propose it,’ he said. ‘Not in my life time or the next.’
Temmink leads the gambling team product and chairs the EC’s Expert Group on Gambling Services.
This may be a cry that is far the EC’s previous stance. In 2011, Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier proposed A eu-wide framework devoted to protecting consumers and citizens, preventing fraudulence, and maintaining the integrity of sports.
EU Action Plan
Barnier’s view at that time was that ‘the prevailing regulatory, societal and[online that is technical] issues in the EU’ could not be ‘tackled adequately by member states individually.’
‘This is very true given the cross-border measurement of on the web gambling,’ he stated in 2012, with regards to was announced that the EC would prepare an ‘action plan’ to make clear the regulation for the sector and encourage cooperation between member states.
The EC frowned regarding the regulatory actions that had been consumed France, Italy, and Spain, which saw those markets ring-fenced and operators taxed at a high rate, in apparent conflict with EU ideals of free motion of services between member states.
Barnier’s plan had beenn’t proposing an individual licensing that is EU, but alternatively had the target of ensuring that member states adopted its eyesight for a far more liberal regulatory landscape across Europe. User states that declined to play ball would then be sanctioned, in Barnier’s vision.
But Barnier left the post in 2014, and his successor, Günther Oettinger, appears less zealous about pushing the cause and more resigned to making legislation to individual jurisdictions.
More Fragmented than Ever
As Temmink explained, ‘we can assure you that whenever we proposed legislation on gambling, in the first conference with the Council, we would have 26 away from 28 member states that will be fiercely opposed to the proposal.
‘It will be committing suicide,’ he added.
Since Barnier outlined his plan in 2012, a wave of new regulation has spread across European countries, and numerous new licensing regimes have sprung up, through the UK to Portugal. Europe has become also less coordinated in the front that is iGaming and the fragmented regulatory landscape proves a greater challenge to operators than ever.
‘Operators need to really have a license for the particular country in which they offer games, without being able to count on the recognition of licenses between one European country and another,’ said Temmink. ‘For their part is for the Member States to ensure a system that is non-discriminatory of permits.’
Nevada Voters Courted by Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Democratic Caucus Would Be Key
Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are focused on reaching as numerous Nevada voters as you possibly can before the Silver State caucuses on Feb. 23rd in what is shaping up to be a make-or-break point within the Democratic campaign. (Image: Jim Young/Reuters)
Nevada voters are the focus for both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders’ campaigns appropriate now, as the two Democratic presidential nominees attempt to persuade as many last-minute voters to vote for them before this week’s February 23rd caucus.
After Clinton’s narrow victory in Iowa, followed by a hefty defeat in brand new Hampshire, the Silver State had long been thought to be her roadblock to stop any Bernie Sanders momentum. She once held a nearly 50-point lead over her challengers, but Sanders’ grassroots movement has severely tightened the race, with numerous analysts now believing Nevada is up for grabs.
Clinton and Sanders each spent the week-end making stops around the state. Sanders campaigned in Reno on Saturday, then Las Vegas on Sunday, while their opponent met with voters in several areas around the gaming mecca throughout the weekend.
The two Democrats concluded the weekend on Sunday during the Victory Missionary Baptist Church in Las Vegas, a congregation largely made up of African-Americans.
‘we send a profound message to the entire country, and that message is that the people of this country will no longer accept establishment politics,’ Sanders said during his brief remarks if we can win here in Nevada.
Clinton responded to Sanders with line as vague as Bernie’s plan of just how he will fund his utopian vision.
‘I am maybe not an issue that is single,’ Clinton said. ‘ Because whenever we had been going to produce everything about banks and cash and politics, would that end racism?’
Say what now?
Nevada Key State in Runoff
When Sanders officially announced his decision to perform for the presidency in May, the so-called ‘Clinton machine’ was already likely to work in Nevada. Volunteers were making hundreds of daily phone calls, going door-to-door, and obtaining endorsements from key state and local leaders.
The Vermont senator didn’t have much of an opportunity, at least according to political pundits.
Fast-forward nine months, and Clinton just canceled an occasion in Florida this week to stay the course in Nevada and shake every hand, ascend each stage, and grasp every microphone she can before Nevadans head to caucus on Saturday.
Nevada has a long history of being a swing state in the general presidential election, and its constituents have actually a nearly perfect record of voting for the eventual winner. Since 1912, Nevada has correctly selected the next president, except for in 1976, when Nevada went along to Gerald Ford over Jimmy Carter.
A win in Nevada for Clinton could be expected, while a victory for Sanders pull off just what would perhaps end up being the biggest political upset in modern history.
Neck-in-Neck towards the Finish
Nevada hosts the gambling epicenter of the United States, so maybe it is appropriate that there’s little evidence that is statistical operate on in determining which candidate will win on Saturday.
The stark reality is that gambling on Clinton or Sanders is equivalent to betting on black or red. Probably the most recent poll from TargetPoint, initial governmental information on the race since late December, has Clinton and Sanders tied 45-45.
Scalia Death Further Stirs the Pot
Including towards the intensity of it all, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away on Saturday in Texas of apparent causes that are natural the chronilogical age of 79. Appointed to the bench by President Reagan in 1986, the consistently conservative judge’s death leaves a vacancy on the highest court that is already causing more political divide between Republicans and Democrats.
A host of names have been tossed around, including current Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval (R). Though Sandoval’s GOP label might make him appear unlikely for the Obama endorsement, his pro-choice and pro-immigration views could make the first Silver State governor of Hispanic history a welcomed compromise to both conservative and liberal congressional leaders.
Nevada Gaming Regulator Michonne Ascuaga Resigns Over Alleged Sparks Nugget Improprieties
Michonne Ascuaga, who may have resigned from the Nevada Gaming Commission in the wake of the news that a home she formerly managed with her family, the Sparks Nugget in north Nevada, is being investigated for lax anti-money laundering controls. (Image: ktvn.com)
Michonne Ascuaga has resigned from her post in the Nevada Gaming Commission, following the revelation of so-called financial improprieties at the Sparks Nugget, the casino in northern Nevada that she managed for 16 years.
The Nugget has been investigated by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) over allegations that it neglected to comply with financial regulations during Ascuaga’s tenure, and neglected to establish an effective anti-money program that is laundering.
The investigation found light in a court filing week that is last as part of a longstanding contractual lawsuit brought by the Ascuaga family members from the casino’s new owners, Wolfhound Holdings, the private investment group that purchased the home in 2013.
Sandoval Unaware of Investigation
A spokeswoman for Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval said that Sandoval was unaware associated with investigation whenever he appointed Ascuaga to the Gaming Commission panel last April.
‘Michonne Ascuaga has served the Nevada Gaming Commission well,’ composed Brian Sandoval in accepting the resignation. ‘we admire her and desire to recognize her family’s long history as leaders in the gaming industry.
‘I appreciate he added that she has put the credibility and reputation of the Gaming Commission first. ‘Michonne is a consummate professional and will still be a frontrunner in our community.’
Ascuaga has claimed in a formal statement that she ‘did not purposely hold back information from the governor.’
‘The Sparks Nugget was informed in November 2013 by the Department of Treasury that the Department was investigating she added whether it was appropriate to impose civil penalties for possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations. ‘The matter arose from an audit-type assessment conducted by the IRS during the casino this year. This is all disclosed immediately to the buyer.’
It really is alleged that the Nugget will be investigated for laxity in its record-keeping and reporting requirements. By legislation, all businesses must file a Currency Transaction Report on all deals over $10,000, and report any dubious activity to FinCEN, as an easy method of guarding against money-laundering.
Ascuaga could be the daughter of John L. Ascuaga, the son of the Basque shepherd who owned the Nugget for over 50 years before its sale to Wolfhound. The Ascuaga family believes it is still owed $500,000 underneath the sale and purchase agreement of the Nugget.
Ascuaga said she was resigning ‘out of deep respect for the Nevada Gaming Commission also to not allow myself to become an unnecessary distraction from the important regulatory oversight work it does.’